Sunday, March 24, 2013

The Absurd and the Worrisome



The cure for the evils of democracy is more democracy!
H. L. Mencken, Notes on Democracy, 1926

It has been an active week from a political perspective and it is now clear what the legislative battles will encompass for the next several months.

The Madison Conservative will begin to discuss these issues in depth upon our return in two weeks – next weeks post will be missed due to the Easter holiday.

The following bits of news information will provide the basis for the forthcoming discussions. They are garnered from various and sundry news sources and should be understood as evidence that in many ways, indeed the lunatics are running the asylum, and running it poorly.

These are being collated and posted with no specific rhyme or reason, save maybe for their absurdity level.

To wit:

A news story on the idiocy of ‘fairness’ gripping the political and media classes:

A Massachusetts principal has been criticized for canceling his school's Honors Night, saying it could be 'devastating' to the students who worked hard, but fell short of the grades.

David Fabrizio, principal of Ipswich Middle School, notified parents last week of his plan to eliminate the event.

"The Honors Night, which can be a great sense of pride for the recipients' families, can also be devastating to a child who has worked extremely hard in a difficult class but who, despite growth, has not been able to maintain a high grade-point average," Fabrizio penned in his first letter to parents, the station reported.

A lengthy report on some classic governmental pork by a self-aggrandizing member of Congress:

A state-of-the-art transportation hub that was going to give students at South Carolina State University a leg up on the competition., the four building, 33-acre complex, named after its most famous alumnus, Rep. James Clyburn, would be a monument to the future -- where students could get hands-on experience and be a part of groundbreaking research in transportation.

Fast forward 15 years and the site once called the "project of the future" has morphed into a money-sucking pit. Aside from the $24 million in federal funding already spent on the project, an estimated $80 million more is needed to finish it. Of the four proposed buildings, only one has been constructed, and the program's core goal -- to provide educational and research opportunities to students at new high-tech facilities -- has obviously not been met.

Federal funding, as of now, has been suspended. But the school could still reapply. Funding for the James E. Clyburn Transportation Center was earmarked by Congress, through the Department of Transportation. 

The problems facing South Carolina State University aren't new or isolated. There have been multiple projects that have been financed or earmarked with taxpayer money that have been forced to be abandoned. Millions of dollars wasted on proposals green-lighted through the federal government and now put on hold have added to the crippling fiscal problems facing the country.

In South Carolina, the almost two decades-old construction project was supposed to include 8,500 square feet of automotive research and education space, a chiller plant and workspace. There were also supposed to be research bays and other transportation work pods. But that isn't what happened.

According to Clyburn, the 2005 groundbreaking was followed by a series of bizarre and crippling problems.

Clyburn, in a statement provided by his office, said the school learned -- after the groundbreaking -- that it did not own 3 acres in the middle of the 23-acre site and that negotiations to purchase that property took 18 months. Another year was tacked on for the city of Orangeburg to deed the street involved to the university. Then the state of South Carolina ordered the university to complete a traffic impact study, which took six months to do. In 2008, the chief architect for the project was diagnosed with cancer. This was followed by a record number of permit denials and modification demands. In 2009, more than one decade after the project was given the green light by the federal government, it finally won approval of the FHA and State Engineer's Office.

But the headaches only grew, Clyburn said.

The university opened the project up for bids on Dec. 18, 2009. The lowest of the 18 bids was selected, but four of the companies filed a protest. Then the chief architect died, and the search for a new one began. While permits were being secured and staff was being hired, the university underwent its own staffing changes -- there had been three different presidents and the staff on the Clyburn transportation center had changed "four or five times" Clyburn said.
Spiraling construction costs and the loss of federal recognition for the facility brought the program to a standstill multiple times. And last year, the school was hit with a number of audits. There have also been allegations of missing money and reports of duplicate billings, questionable payments and abuses by individual employees at the center.

The school itself is facing declining enrollment numbers and a $6 million shortfall.
University spokeswoman Antia Dawkins said in a written statement that the university has had to make changes in its plan to complete the center.

"The current approach is to seek the advice of a broad-based advisory board consisting of subject-matter experts in transportation," she said. "This advisory board will help us shape the focus and direction for the Transportation Initiative."
There is a possibility the amount of money the school needs to finish the project could eclipse the estimated $80 million.

"While various transportation activities have been discussed and included in our Transportation Program over the last 15 years, we cannot adequately determine the financial requirement for any plan that was discussed over that time period," Dawkins said.

Since accusations of gross mismanagement hit the school, Clyburn's enthusiasm seemed to ease a bit for the problem-plagued project. But instead of blaming the school and reported mishandling of resources, Clyburn believes the problem is a political one.
"The faculty and the school have become victims of vicious manufactured attacks by political partisans, and that is unfortunate for the university and the students who would benefit from this program," Clyburn said in a written statement to FoxNews.com Monday. "I don't know what the future of the center is, and I will leave that up to the university and its alumni to determine."

The reality that ‘Big Brother’ is watching:

The U.S. government is expanding a cybersecurity program that scans Internet traffic headed into and out of defense contractors to include far more of the country's private, civilian-run infrastructure.

As a result, more private sector employees than ever before, including those at big banks, utilities and key transportation companies, will have their emails and Web surfing scanned as a precaution against cyber attacks.

Under last month's White House executive order on cybersecurity, the scans will be driven by classified information provided by U.S. intelligence agencies — including data from the National Security Agency (NSA) — on new or especially serious espionage threats and other hacking attempts. U.S. spy chiefs said on March 12 that cyber attacks have supplanted terrorism as the top threat to the country.

Something from the comedy of the absurd:

Customers who want to pay with a $100 bill at a Rhode Island chain of restaurants will now have to fill out a form.

WJAR-TV reports that all four locations of Gregg’s will now require a name, phone number and driver’s license number whenever someone pays with a $100 bill.
Owner Bob Bacon says it’s because they have received five fake $100s in the last three months. He tells the station the policy is not about getting restitution if they receive a fake bill. He says it’s about creating a paper trail so they can track down whoever is making the fake bills.

A reminder that all tyranny needs to defeat democracy is for good people to go silent in the face of the loss of any modicum of liberty:

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid demanded Thursday that any bill that passes the Senate on gun control include broader background checks, drawing a tougher line on the issue ahead of a contentious floor debate next month.
Reid plans to tee up a vote on a package in early April, the first floor fight over guns in the wake of deadly mass killings, including at an elementary school in Newtown, Conn., late last year.

The absolute idiocy of the Senate leadership in their apparent belief that the American electorate is not being taxed enough:

After a grueling, all-night debate that ended close to 5 a.m., the Senate on Saturday adopted its first budget in four years, a $3.7 trillion blueprint for 2014 that would fast-track passage of tax increases, trim spending gingerly and leave the government still deeply in the debt a decade from now. The tax bill would amount to approximately 1 trillion dollars over ten years.

And further proof that government is never one to miss a trick gouging the beleaguered American taxpayer:

Governors in cash-strapped states are revving the motor on efforts to hike the gasoline tax to cover shortfalls or pay for transportation projects -- frustrating drivers, Republican lawmakers and others in a delicate economy.

The tax hikes mean that drivers could soon be paying more at the pump, even if the price of fuel goes down.

Wyoming and California have already approved increases. Wyoming's state gas tax goes from 14 cents to 24 cents a gallon in July and is projected to bring in roughly $70 million in fiscal 2014 for transportation projects. And California regulators last month approved a 3.5-cent hike on its state excise tax that will take effect in July and increase the cost of an average fill-up by roughly 52 cents.
At least 14 other states -- including Maryland, Massachusetts and Minnesota -- have either passed similar increases or are considering them, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

And after all, it is only a million dollars in a time of 16 trillion dollar debt and a slashing of public tours of the White House:

Vice President Biden and his entourage spent a little time in London in early February during his first foreign trip of the second term of the Obama administration.  A document released today revealed that the cost of lodging in London alone was close to half a million dollars. The contract was awarded on January 30, 2013 to the Hyatt Regency London for a total of $459,388.65.
As it turns out, Vice President Joe Biden's London stay in February was not the most expensive part of his trip. A government document released on February 14, 2013 shows that the contract for the Hotel Intercontinental Paris Le Grand came in at $585,000.50.

Still looking for a buck instead of being responsible fiscal stewards – this issue is exceptionally troubling for a nation looking for an economic resurgence:

Advocates of an effort to help states collect taxes on Internet sales won a symbolic but important victory Friday as the Senate signaled solid bipartisan support for the proposal.
Senators voted 75-24 for a nonbinding measure that endorses giving states more power to collect existing sales taxes on purchases their residents make from out-of-state Internet companies.

And lastly, for those convinced that members of Congress are so far removed from their constituency and live in a warped universe where hyperbole is never confronted with reality:

Automatic federal cuts are bringing staffers to the brink of starvation, suggested Debbie Wasserman Schultz, at a recent House Legislative Branch Appropriations Subcommittee hearing.

Restaurants on the House side of Congress are increasing in cost so much that aides are being “priced out” of a good meal, she said. The comments came by way of a discussion about the impacts of the sequester on lawmakers’ office budgets. Rep. Jim Moran said he may be forced to lay off a staffer — and then Ms. Wasserman Schultz weighed in with her tale of hard times.

{Just to clarify: An 8-ounce bowl of Ham and Bean soup at the Cannon Office Building’s carry-out cafĂ© costs $2. A gourmet wrap or sliced bread sandwich sells for about $5. And in the Longworth Building’s sit-down cafeteria, a serving of stuffed chicken, asparagus and mashed potatoes sells for about $7.}

Meanwhile, Ms. Wasserman Schultz’s staffers earn between $60,000 and $160,000 per year.



Sunday, March 17, 2013

March 17th, 2013 - A Cursory Recap of the Week That Was.

The cure for the evils of democracy is more democracy!
H. L. Mencken, Notes on Democracy, 1926

A cursory recap of the folly and nonsense being perpetrated upon the American electorate this past by the political class and their sycophantic media hacks demonstrate a depth of ignorance shocking in its scope.

To wit:

 President Obama this week stated in an ABC News interview that this nation does not have a looming debt crisis – his quote:

“We don’t have an immediate crisis in terms of debt. In fact, for the next ten years, it’s gonna be in a sustainable place”

At 16 trillion dollars – ($16,000,000,000,000) and growing, it could be said that the President is being disingenuous at best, ignorant at worst.

The current debate on gun control is expanding to include what are euphemistically called ‘background checks’. These checks will not affect law abiding citizens, but the hue and cry is to have these checks include mental health history. This information will be provided as a result of the Affordable Care Act – (ObamaCare). The question must be addressed: Do Americans want their personal medical history provided to a bureaucracy with no controls regulating that information? (The Madison Conservative will address the background check issue in a later post.)

At a time when there is an obvious lack of leadership, at a time when the American people are not being given a true perspective on the importance of what America truly means, the Madison Conservative believes a quick refresher course is in order.

To that end, please read the following address from President Lincoln. It is timeless and timely for Americans to remember what this nation means, and how a true leader speaks to the people in only 278 words.

Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.

But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate -- we can not consecrate -- we can not hallow -- this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us -- that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion -- that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain -- that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom -- and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.

Sunday, March 10, 2013

Mr. Paul Goes to Washington


This past week Senator Rand Paul provided the American electorate a true Profile in Courage. Whether one agrees or disagrees with the Senators’ political perspective is not the issue; an elected official making a principled stand should be the norm, not the rarity. The political class and their media flacks for the most part attempted to ridicule Senator Paul’s’ filibuster, yet it was they who seemed to be the joke.


In support of his efforts, the Madison Conservative respectfully reprints in its entirety the Senators published response. The article was published in The Washington Post on March 8th, 2013.

Please read it thoroughly and lend his efforts your support if you find his motives valid.

To wit:

By Rand Paul, Published: March 8

If I had planned to speak for 13 hours when I took the Senate floor Wednesday, I would’ve worn more comfortable shoes. I started my filibuster with the words, “I rise today to begin to filibuster John Brennan’s nomination for the CIA. I will speak until I can no longer speak” — and I meant it.
I wanted to sound an alarm bell from coast to coast. I wanted everybody to know that our Constitution is precious and that no American should be killed by a drone without first being charged with a crime. As Americans, we have fought long and hard for the Bill of Rights. The idea that no person shall be held without due process, and that no person shall be held for a capital offense without being indicted, is a founding American principle and a basic right.
My official starting time was 11:47 a.m. on Wednesday, March 6, 2013.
I had a large binder of materials to help me get through my points, but although I sometimes read an op-ed or prepared remarks in between my thoughts, most of my filibuster was off the top of my head and straight from my heart. From 1 to 2 p.m., I barely looked at my notes. I wanted to make sure that I touched every point and fully explained why I was demanding more information from the White House.
Just before 3 p.m., Sens. Mike Lee (R-Utah) and Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) came to the Senate floor to help out. Under Senate rules, I could not yield the floor or my filibuster would end, and Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) could have shut me down. The only way for me to continue and allow Sens. Lee and Cruz to speak was to yield the floor for questions.
Their presence gave me strength and inspiration. Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) also arrived to help. Sen. Ron Wyden (Ore.), the only Democrat who came to my defense, explained how we have worked together to demand more information from the White House about the rules for drone strikes. At about 4:30 p.m., Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) joined. I was flagging for a while, but these senators kept me going.
Sen. Reid came to the Senate floor to ask me when I would be done so he could schedule a vote. But I wasn’t ready to yield. I felt I had a lot more explaining to do.
At about 6:30 p.m., something extraordinary happened. Sen. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.), who has been recovering from a stroke, came to the floor to give me something. I was not allowed to drink anything but water or eat anything but the candy left in our Senate desks. But he brought me an apple and a thermos full of tea — the same sustenance Jimmy Stewart brought to the Senate floor in the movie “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington.” That was a moment I will never forget.
Sen. Cruz came to the floor again just before 7:30 p.m. and said, “Given that the Senate rules do not allow for the use of cellular phones on the floor of the Senate, I feel quite confident that the senator from Kentucky is not aware of the Twitter-verse that has been exploding.”
I had little idea of what was going on. I was allowed only to talk and listen to questions. As I started to walk around the Senate chamber to loosen up my legs, I was energized by the responses on Twitter. Sen. Cruz really lifted my spirits when he read the tweets.
Then something unexpected happened. House conservatives started appearing in the back of the chamber to show their support. Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Tex.), who stayed for five hours, offered me his boots when I complained that I had not worn my most comfortable shoes. My good friend Rep. Thomas Massie from Kentucky came over. And then came the conservative cavalry of Reps. Justin Amash (Mich.), Ron DeSantis (Fla.), Doug LaMalfa (Calif.), Garland “Andy” Barr (Ky.), Trey Radel (Fla.), Michael Burgess (Tex.), Jim Bridenstine (Okla.), Raul R. Labrador (Idaho), Keith Rothfus (Pa.), Paul Gosar (Ariz.), Steve Daines (Mont.), Bill Huizenga (Mich.), Richard Hudson (N.C.) and David Schweikert (Ariz.).
Over the evening I had the support of Republican Sens. John Barrasso (Wyo.), Mitch McConnell (Ky.), Saxby Chambliss (Ga.), John Cornyn (Tex.), John Thune (S.D.), Pat Toomey (Pa.) and Ron Johnson (Wis.). And Sens. Cruz, Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) and Tim Scott (R-S.C.) used the opportunity to make their first speaking appearances on the Senate floor. Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) came at the end to speak, but after midnight, I had said enough.
By the end of the night, I was tired and my voice was cracking. I ended by saying, “The cause here is one that I think is important enough to have gone through this procedure.” I talked about the idea of compromise, but said that “you don’t get half of the Fifth Amendment.” I argued that we need more extended debates. And finally, at 12:40 a.m., I yielded the floor.
On Thursday, the Senate confirmed John Brennanas director of the CIA. But this debate isn’t over.
The Senate has the power to restrain the executive branch — and my filibuster was the beginning of the fight to restore a healthy balance of powers. The president still needs to definitively say that the United States will not kill American noncombatants. The Constitution’s Fifth Amendment applies to all Americans; there are no exceptions.
The outpouring of support for my filibuster has been overwhelming and heartening. My office has fielded thousands of calls. Millions have followed this debate on TV, Twitter and Facebook. On Thursday, the White House produced another letter explaining its position on drone strikes. But the administration took too long, and parsed too many words and phrases, to instill confidence in its willingness or ability to protect our liberty.
I hope my efforts help spur a national debate about the limits of executive power and the scope of every American’s natural right to be free. “Due process” is not just a phrase that can be ignored at the whim of the president; it is a right that belongs to every citizen in this great nation.
I believe the support I received this past week shows that Americans are looking for someone to really stand up and fight for them. And I’m prepared to do just that.


Sunday, March 3, 2013

The Sequester and Political Cowardice



We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.


The Sequester reality check:

President Obama, February 28th, 2013:

“Starting tomorrow everybody here, all the folks who are cleaning the floors at the Capitol. Now that Congress has left, somebody’s going to be vacuuming and cleaning those floors and throwing out the garbage. They’re going to have less pay. The janitors, the security guards, they just got a pay cut, and they’ve got to figure out how to manage that. That’s real.”

…Later that day:

Carlos Elias, the Capitol Building superintendent, sent out a memo reminding staffers that the current sequestration plan does not include “reductions in force or furloughs” and that “pay and benefit of each of our employees will not be impacted.”

Last week while discussing the potentially apocalyptic nature of the ‘cuts’ a cabinet secretary said this:

Education Secretary Arne Duncan told CBS “there are literally teachers now who are getting pink slips, who are getting notices that they can’t come back this fall."

…And then a few days later:

Duncan appeared to backpedal Wednesday, coming up with just one example, a West Virginia county, and the disclaimer that “whether it’s all sequester-related, I don’t know.”

It has now been two days since the sequester was signed by the President. There has been no quantifying negative effect as had been prognosticated by the legislative class.  In what was a political gambit soundly lost, the attempts by the current administration to garner support against House Republicans and force tax increases failed for several reasons, but the most significant was this:

The facts were against them and the American people instinctively knew it.

The President, his administration and their media sycophants wasted a truly singular opportunity to secure the blessings of liberty for ourselves and our posterity by simply being honest with the citizenry.

To wit:

Consider this missed true leadership scenario:

The President could have made a nationally televised speech and informed the people that given our sixteen trillion ($16,000,000,000,000) and growing national debt, our one trillion ($1,000,000,000,000) annual budget deficit – projected to be such each year for the foreseeable future – it would be untenable to continue this budgetary madness. He had thus directed his administration to undertake a literal line by line evaluation of the national budget - which for four years he has opted not to present – and to reconsider the nation’s priorities. He will be publishing his budget online within the next 24 hours so that each and every citizen can examine his choices.

It would have been historic; it would have put this nation on firm fiscal footing for a generation and spurred economic growth not seen for fifty years.

Regardless of his choices, it would have passed by an almost unanimous congressional vote, given that the American people would have voiced support to their representatives. The American electorate is smarter than the government understands. Securing a firm financial foundation is greater than short term political, cowardly choices.

Sadly, neither party opted for this choice of action.

Instead, it was preferable to take the ridiculous route of making claims of starving children, refusing medical care to our seasoned citizens and laying down our arms so that our enemies could defeat our shell of a once dominant military.

Truly absurd, but more importantly it is demonstrating a true lack of leadership.

The President of the United States is the most powerful political figure on the planet.

He was unable to rationally cut 44 billion ($44,000,000,000) dollars from a 1.4 trillion (1,400,000,000,000) dollar budget, or about 2 percent.

Such ineptitude by all members of our government does not bode well for freedom, and the American people deserve better.