The cure for the evils of
democracy is more democracy!
H. L. Mencken, Notes on
Democracy, 1926
{ed. note: in observance of the
Thanksgiving holiday, there will be no post next week. We will return in two
weeks. Happy Thanksgiving & Happy Hanukkah to all}
Senator
Harry Reid, the majority leader of the Senate, and with the duplicity of a
sufficient number of Democratic Senators, consciously chose to pervert the
United States Constitution this week, acting on nothing more than political expediency
and politicalcowardice.
The
cynical and short sighted decision by Reid to change the filibuster rules in
the Senate from a 60 vote requirement to a simple majority was not, as so many
pundits incorrectly asserted, a question of constitutionality.
The
rules of the Senate are just that – the rules of the Senate.
What
Reid did do, at the bidding and behest of President Obama, was to disregard the
wisdom and intent of the framers and the founders of the United States
Constitution.
The
matter all arose due to the Republican minority choosing to block judicial
appointments on the belief that the intended appointees were too liberal.
The
question of whether such choices are either right or wrong is not the issue at
hand; such actions are their right and responsibility under Article 2, Section
2 of the Constitution.
Consider
the relevant excerpt from that august document:
“He shall have Power, by and with
the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of
the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice
and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers
and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United
States…”
The
key words here are ‘advice and consent’.
What
Reid and the President have done is to remove the advice part and gone right to
the rubber stamp of a simple majority consent.
The
ability to change the rules of the Senate on such a political whim means that
should the recalcitrant Republicans choose to impede any legislative actions
requested by the president, the cowardly Reid can change the rules again to
assure passage of the bill at hand.
The
choice to enact the so-called ‘nuclear option’ is not a new gambit – indeed the
Republicans threatened to do the same thing during the administration of
President Bush.
Of
course, at that time, a freshman senator named Barack Obama rose to speak on
the floor of the senate to warn that such actions would be the ‘tyranny of the
majority’.
At
the same time, then minority leader Reis called such proposals to be
‘un-American’.
And
hypocrisy reigns freely from Washington.
The
reasons Reid chose to change the rules centered on judicial appointments.
The
President is a democrat – the Senate is led by a majority of Democrats. They
are now free to appoint people to the judiciary that agree with and have shown
a proclivity to imposing liberal legislation from the bench.
In
short, the President is attempting to control the executive, legislative and
judiciary branches of government under a single individual –himself.
The
namesake of this blog, James Madison, had an opinion on such attempts, and his
wisdom speaks to the nation he helped found over 200 years later:
To
wit:
“The
accumulation of all powers, Legislative, Executive, and Judiciary, in the same
hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed,
or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.”
No comments:
Post a Comment