Reality Check - ( A Quick Hits Commentary)

 

The cure for the evils of democracy is more democracy!

H. L. Mencken, Notes on Democracy, 1926

 

(welcome to the premier “Quick Hits” commentary previously announced)

 

Well that was quick. The political left had no sooner taken a heartbeat break from vilifying President Trump than they discovered their newest Nazi target – Elon Musk.

 

There is noPurpose in arguing that point because hateful idiots cannot be reasoned with.

 

For the ignorant amongst us, lets look at the Elon issue from a dispassionate view.

 

To wit:

 

The left decries he is unelected and thus should have no power or authority.

 

Spoiler alert – he doesn’t.

 

A quick examination of the Constitution points out that the President and Vice President are the ONLY people who are elected in the EXECUTIVE branch of government. Elon is NOT making policy. The President appoints EVERYBODY  else.

 

Elon is doing NOTHING other than conducting an AUDIT of the governments books, nothing other than what every company does.

 

We find it amusing that nobody on the political left or their sycophantic media are supporting trans operas in Africa, but rather choose to focus on their talking point that Elon has no right to announce it to the world..

 

The left would be well advised to read the Constitution and read how ALL budgetary issues MUST begin in the House. In other words, those folks budgeted for all the waste Musk is uncovering. They appropriated it, Elon is merely shining a light on it. For that simple act The left must destroy the man.

 

Musk is doing nothing more than would any other patriot.

 

It’s that simple.

 

 

 

A Madison Conservative Update

 

The cure for the evils of democracy is more democracy!

H. L. Mencken, Notes on Democracy, 1926

 

The Madison Conservative was born of necessity. Amid the blather and noise of politics, there seemed to be no cogent debate supporting the Constitutional framework within those debates. During the Biden administration, we had a multitude of topics to write about because Joe Biden was as unconstitutional a president as this nation has ever had to endure.

 

As we began considering the new Trump administration, we reviewed our columns from TRUMP I. We discovered a dearth of constitutional topics. Trump was never dull, but he fully respected the Constitution.

 

So we are going to try something different. We will be adding regular “COMMENTARIES” to our platform. Preserving, protecting  and defending the Constitution will remain our mandate, but if the first weeks of TRUMP II are any indication, there will be a lot of material coming our way.

 

Check back often. You never know what might strike our fancy.

 

 

 

 

Immunity, Ignorance, Idiocy & Political Illiteracy - ( A Madison Conservative Rant)

 

The cure for the evils of democracy is more democracy!

H. L. Mencken, Notes on Democracy, 1926

 

It is becoming painfully clear that the political class, the media conglomerates, and our elected representatives  are just as addled as President Biden in a debate  when discussing  the recent Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity.

There had never been a need in the entirety of American  history for the Supreme Court to rule on the issue.

Until Donald Trump got elected and the political left lost their collective minds and decided tearing up the United States Constitution was a perfectly rational act in their desire  to stop Hitler.

We at The Madison Conservative are disgusted by that approach.

In order to clarify the decision, a quick factual review seems appropriate.

 

To wit:

 

The state of Colorado tried to remove Trump from  the ballot because, we presume, they thought he tweeted mean things.

In a 9-0 unanimous vote, the Supreme Court ruled such actions were unconstitutional.

Trump, with all due respect, won nothing. The Court gave a victory to the Constitution, and in doing so foreshadowed that the rule of law would continue to prevail. Nobody seemed to take note. Big mistake.

The political left then conspired to prosecute Trump on novel legal theories. Their goal was simple: convict him of any felony so that Biden could use the term “convicted felon”. The unparalled legal research team of the Madison Conservative still has not determined exactly what crime Trump committed.

As an aside to that point, what crime did he commit that had no victims but forced him to pay an unprecedented $175 million bond?

 

Back to the issue.

 

All the justices did was to affirm that ANY  President has absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for any and all actions taken  in their role as President. If he or she  commits crimes as president the Constitution provides for their impeachment, and if convicted, removal from office.

Does “high crimes and misdemeanors” ring a bell?

 

The Supreme Court returned tha case to the lower court to determine what are official presidential acts and what are to be considered personal acts.

In short, nothing has changed. In their haste and hatred of Trump, the liberal courts and prosecutors bypassed due process.

 

Whoops.

 

In her dissent, Justice Sotomayor wrote that the majority ruling would allow a President to order Seal Team Six to go murder a political opponent. This idiotic statement became the talking point and rallying cry of Democrats and the hyperbolic left. They decried the “MAGA” court created a king.

 

It seems that President Obama beat Trump to the royal throne. The memory loss afflicting Biden seems to be spreading. Obama authorized the execution of FOUR American Citizens with a drone attack. Understand, they were working with al-Qaeda, so good riddance to bad trash. BUT they were citizens murdered without their due process rights AS citizens. I do not remember seeing the photo of Obama being led away in handcuffs. The political  left should read more Madison Conservative before demonstrating their ignorance. In doing so, they could save themselves from public embarrassment.

 

If it was not so serious, Biden’s reaction to the ruling was a surreal farce.

 

He stated that Trump would trample the rule of law and become a dictator.

 Biden, of course, made note of how he always follows the law as President. He no doubt has forgotten that  he stole top-secret documents out of a skiff.

 

We digress. Back to the immunity ruling.

 

The president has bragged in campaign speeches that the Court ruled his student-loan pay-off scheme was unconstitutional, given he had no presidential authority for such an authorization. Any such program needed to pass through the legislative branch. No problem, explains Mr. law-abiding executive. He just did it anyway. No “MAGA” court was going to tell him “NO”.

Thus proving what  an authoritarian and America loving  fraud he is.

We would be remiss if we did not make note that Rep. Ocasio-Cortez commented how she would offer articles of impeachment against the 6 justices who ruled FOR immunity. As it js with her extreme left political imbeciles, including Biden, their guiding philosophy of democracy is “my way or we imprison you.”

 

When the executive and legislative branches of a trilateral government vow revenge and disdain for an equal third, something is amiss.

 

Good thing the Democrats are running on a platform of preserving democracy and stopping Hitler.

Maybe they should read the document they have sworn to uphold.  Political illiteracy is no defense for political stupidity.

 

 

 

You Can't Have It Both Ways. Trump V. New York

 The cure for the evils of democracy is more democracy!
H. L. Mencken, Notes on Democracy, 1926

{ed. Note – please read the entire post before sending e-mails that we have surrendered our conservative bona fides}

The Madison Conservative, like most of the world, has taken note of the Donald Trump trial and the verdict. Naturally we have an opinion on the entire thing, but like our vote, believe that it is nobody’s business what that opinion might include.
This platform is dedicated to the greatest document ever conceived by the mind of man on the concept of freedom. It is with regard to the United States Constitution that will frame this discussion.
To wit:
The ignorance of the political left is equal to the blather on the political right. Media personalities on the left are actually celebrating the guilty verdict with no concept of what has happened. Their psychotic hatred of Trump is now satiated by their ability to use the term ‘convicted felon, without the ability to explain the crime. They exhort the claim that nobody is above the law.
Agreed.
But neither is anyone below the law. We will await the outcome of the appeals process before dismantling the political lefts’ outright stupidity on the Trump verdict. Because our allegiance is only to the Constitution, rest  assured the political right will receive similar treatment.

No sooner was the verdict read than the loudest voices on the right began clamoring that America was doomed and investigations into the judge, the prosecutor, the jury and the entire New York legal system must begin post-haste..
As a wise woman once told me, and forgive the language, “a pox on both their houses.”
Sounds about right.
What troubles the Madison Conservative most is that had the decision been NOT GUILTY, or a hung jury, the side would have reflexively flipped, and with the same measure of ignorance.
Consider the incompatible inconsistencies of their collective arguments.
The guilty outcome was said to prove that the system worked.
From a Constitutional perspective, it did.
Those who disagree are waiting for the Constitutional appeals process to redress an injustice. If the left loses with the appeals process, will they spit vitriol and claim the system is rigged? Will the political right, if victorious, apologize for their disrespect of the Constitution?
We believe yes to the former and no to the latter.
We ask both sides to stop, take a deep breath and count to the ten amendments.
American democracy is often a messy process, but such is the result when a free people are involved.
The greatest nation has endured turbulence before and will again.
We implore the loudest voices to stop fomenting hatred for their fellow Americans.
Of course, they could always provide the names of all their  friends to the committee. America – one nation, indivisible, land of the free BECAUSE of the BRAVE.
Have a great summer. And be nice to each other.
Thank you.  
 

The 2025 Project

 

The cure for the evils of democracy is more democracy!

H. L. Mencken, Notes on Democracy, 1926

 

{ed. Note – please read the entire post before sending e-mails that we have lost our collective minds}

 

The Madison Conservative was established to provide a constitutional perspective on matters of pulic policy. For more than fifteen years, we have advocated that adhering to the constitutional structure of government was the recipe for a thriving democracy. We have grown chagrined as petty partisan politics have become more and more prevalent, no more so than during the Biden administration. Concurrently, the distillation of conservative principles by the conservative ‘intelligentsia’ has reached a critical mass. The voices of conservatism are no longer the result of thoughtful minds such as William Buckley, but by the loudest voices  shrieking that Biden and the political left are harbingers of a coming apocalypse.

Nonsense.

Give an idiot a bullhorn and the only thing they’ll do with it is yell, with no concern for what they’re shouting.

This is true across the political spectrum.

The Madison Conservative has espoused our belief that we can debate and win  our arguments with the political left by using sound conservative values – biological men cannot become pregnant, for example.  

Once victorious, we would share a root beer float and a Cubs game with our friends who are liberal.

That last sentence as written is important. The Madison Conservative is proud and honored to call many of our political adversaries friends. Conservatives should never label anyone as a “liberal friend”. Friends are friends. The same life experiences that made them a friend shaped their liberal view of the world.

They say opposite attract. To gauge a person’s character by transient qualities such as political preferences is not the mark of a conservative or liberal.

It’s the mark of stupidity.

The same is true within any political ideology. The current stance seems to be an issue of either pledging 100percent fidelity to the most extreme views of the political party or risk being labelled as a traitor to the cause and banishment to the political wilderness.

 

Two quick points on that thought.

Try explaining that to Ronald Reagan and Tip O’Neill.

Second, the last time a nation was pretty much in full agreement on anything was 1930’s Germany, and that really did not work out well.

 

This prelude brings us to the 2025 Project, a so-called ‘conservative’ blueprint for a potential second Trump administration.

A full reading of the proposal, available online with its mission clearly stated, does showcase many brilliant Conservative voices discussing how to apply conservative ideology to government. Luminaries such as Dr. Benjamin Carson make the case on how to limit various departments to only the issues for which they have responsibility, and how to eliminate much of the bloated bureaucracy.

While we applaud many of the concepts, we are horrified at the absolute betrayal of the Constitution, specifically, and conservative principles overall.

The stated mission is to clear the governmental bureaucracy of ‘deep state’ personnel and replace them with ‘true’ conservatives.

In other words, making sure that political thought will be the litmus test for government employment.

This is an abhorrent abuse of democratic principles. Conservatives have been decrying the absolute disgrace of the ‘equity’ agenda. Diversity and inclusiveness absolutely, but equity is where the Madison Conservative opposed the DEI nonsense.

How is hiring like-mined political thinkers any different than making sure someone who only checks the most equity boxes is hired?

Our belief has always held that America believed in having its best and brightest leading the nation.

We disavow in the strongest possible terms this ‘conservative’ plan.

The Madison Conservative research team is hard at work seeking to discover if Donald Trump supports the replacement process as proposed in the 2025 Project. We do hope he considers the ideas within the document, but publicly reject its methodology.

America is a choir of voices, not a solo.

And to my conservative brethren, feel free to loudly disagree with me. I'm still treating the root beer floats.

 

 

 

The Colorado Ballot Nonsense (and why the Supreme Court should ignore it)

 

The cure for the evils of democracy is more democracy!

H. L. Mencken, Notes on Democracy, 1926

 

{ed. Note – please read the entire post before sending e-mails that we have lost our collective minds}

 

The Madison Conservative has repeatedly used its bully pulpit to expound on the reality that the United States Constitution -  the most wondrous document ever conceived on the right of people to be free – in no way, shape, manner or form accepts the concept of political parties having any legitimate function with respect to government. America was NOT created or designed as a two-party nation.

This simple fact is the foundation of our belief that the United States Supreme Court should not take up debate on the farce that is the case of Colorado keeping Donald Trump off its states primary ballot. The Justices should take all the filings and toss them in the dumpster.

And then go watch a Cubs game.

 

Now, before we are inundated with correspondence screeching that we are destroying democracy by suggesting such heresy, read on.

 

We say nonsense. In fact, our stance strengthens democracy 10-fold, in stark contrast to the anarchists of the political class and their stenographic cohorts in the media.

 

Consider these points:

 

When Colorado removed Trump from the ballot, what is lost in the argument  is that it was a PRIMARY ballot. The primaries are the function of PRIVATE ENTITIES. They have NO government standing, according to the founders and framers of the Constitution. The Supreme Court should have no interest.

 

·      The Colorado state Republican Party responded to the ballot action by stating if Trump was not restored to the ballot, the would move to a caucus process to choose their candidate. Outstanding idea. Keep the taxpayer out of it and let the private entity pay their own expenses. The caucus system worked fine for Iowa, and they were able to declare a winner in about 30 minutes. Rather impressive for a state-wide election.

·      The process for national offices is contained in the Constitution. States cannot supersede it because they hate Trump. If any state tried to remove Trump from a national ballot, at that point the Supreme Court would have a reason to intercede, and would restore his name.

·      The Madison Conservative is always heartened when the Constitution comes to the forefront of public debate. Sadly, we are convinced that many on the political left, including President Biden, have never actually read the document. The evidence for that belief is the idiocy and ignorance of those claiming Trump is ineligible because he participated in the January 6^th riots, stating categorically that the event was an “insurrection.” Remember that NO ONE, let alone Trump, has EVER been charged or convicted of that crime. As an aside, an insurrection by definition requires that the insurrectionist must be armed. NOBODY has been charged with weapons possession. The only person killed on January 6^th was an unarmed participant who was shot by a Capitol police offer. So the 14^th Amendment gambit is at best a whopper of a canard.

So the political class and media across all ideologies are completely wrong on every issue related to both the primaries and Trumps eligibility. In an effort to create the daily soap opera script that is news these days, all media outlets present their legal experts expressing that the Supreme Courts Colorado decision will decide the fate of democracy for the next millenia.

 

The Supreme Court, and the American electorate, should not allow this nonsense to continue. Political parties and their primary process should be relegated to the scrap heap of history. They have no purpose and only exist to keep the inept in power and to generate cashflow for media companies.

It is our sincere hope that the Supreme Court tells the children of politics to get off Americas grass and play somewhere else.

 

 

Forty Percent

 

The cure for the evils of democracy is more democracy!

H. L. Mencken, Notes on Democracy, 1926

 

 

{editors note: In discussions on how to approach this topic, two quotes kept entering the debate. We decided to utilize both, despite some question as to their origins.

To wit:

All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent. – credited to Thomas Jefferson

 

With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably.

Credited to Star Trek: The Next Generation}

 

 

Tyranny is at the door and it seems that the electorate appears to be, at best, either ambivalent or oblivious to that reality. The founders and framers constructed the United States Constitution specifically to protect the individual. It was designed to limit the power of government. The rights of freedom for America’s citizenry are beautifully enshrined within the first ten amendments, known as the Bill of Rights.

 

The political left is intent on dismantling those rights because of a specific hatred.

 

We would ask you to consider what happens when the following constitutional rights are ignored for any single American citizen.

 

To wit:

 

An American citizen is told that they may not speak about their court proceedings, but if they do, severe sanctions will be imposed for simply speaking.

First Amendment
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

 

Is it acceptable to be threatened with imprisonment for speaking your truth? The freedom of speech is meant not to protect speech you accept, but for that which you hate loathe and despise.

The same American is in dispute with the government over ownership of papers. Rather than allow the legal process to follow its just course, the government launches a raid to seize the documents. They even search underwear drawers, a site that would not be listed in a warrant, as mandated by the Constitution. Remember the Constitution limits the actions of the government. It might be difficult and cumbersome to legally delineate specifics in a warrant, but therein is the point.

 

Fourth Amendment
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

 

As the American citizen is prosecuted by the state, and while a civil and not criminal case, he is not afforded the right to examine the witnesses against him. Oddly, the only witness against him is the states prosecutor, who ran for office specifically to put the one citizen in jail. Not on a platform of protecting the people, but to railroad this singular person. The case brought against this citizen has no victims. All associated parties have all been made whole in the normal course of business. The state, however, wants this one citizen crushed. So the prosecution and persecution continues unabated.

  

Sixth Amendment
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

 

The State, having secured a guilty verdict, a decision THEY KNOW WILL BE OVERTURNED, nevertheless continues with imposing a penalty. The populace is aware that OJ Simpson who was found liable for butchering two human beings was ordered to pay thirty million dollars. There was no victim, and no crime in the case of the Citizen. Somehow a single judge was allowed to impose a penalty in excess of ten-fold to the OJ penalty. In addition, the citizen has 30 days to post that amount in order to appeal, and the prosecutor has gleefully announced the State will seize assets to satisfy the judgement.

 

Eighth Amendment
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

 

We are confident that our readers are fully aware the citizen of this narrative is Donald Trump.

This post however is not a defense of Trump. It IS a warning to the American people to take heed of the quotes that led this column. The Constitution was written to prevent the government from doing exactly what they are attempting to do to Trump.

Love him or hate him, he is correct when he states that if they can do it to him, they will certainly do it to all of us.

We implore you to let your voice be heard in defense of the Constitution, or surely those quotes will become self fulfilling prophecies.

Unless you are comfortable surrendering 40 percent of your constitutional rights.